Ngaba i-Canada yokuQala yokuXhatshazwa kwe-Twitter yaseKhanada yabeka into eyoyikisayo kubafazi?

I-Intanethi yaba yindawo nje embi nakwabasetyhini baseCanada.

Isigwebo kwinto ekukholelwa ukuba yiCanada & apos; ityala lokuqala lokuhlukumeza iTwitter labhengezwa ngolwe-Sihlanu. Kwindlela yokumisela eyandulelayo, iNkundla yezoBulungisa yase-Ontario isigqibo Ukuhlukumeza abasetyhini kwi-Intanethi ayilolwaphulo-mthetho.

UMgwebi uBrent Knazanufumene uGregory Alan Elliott engenatyalayokuhlukumeza ulwaphulo mthetho lwabasetyhini baseToronto uSteph Guthrie noHeather Reilly. Kubabukeli abaninzi, isigqibo sikaKnazan & apos sibonise ukuba inkqubo yezomthetho ayibuqondi ngokupheleleyo ubundlobongela obujoliswe kwabasetyhini okanye iindlela ezisisiseko abantu baseKhanada abasebenza ngazo kwi-Intanethi.

Ngasemva: UGuthrie uxelele amapolisa ukuba waziva ehlutshwa emva kokudibana kunye no-Elliott ehlotyeni lowama-2012. Nasemva kokuba emnqandile, waqhubeka nokumbetha ngeetweets kwaye wakwenza kwacaca ukuba unolwazi oluneenkcukacha ngobumelwane ahlala kubo. unokukhetha ii-hashtag azenzileyo, ngokuzifaka ngokwakhe kwiingxoxo malunga nombutho wakhe Abasetyhini kwiPolitiki yaseToronto. (Ukuvezwa ngokupheleleyo: Ndiyayazi iGuthrie ngeToronto & apos; izangqa ezincinane zobufazi, ndiyawuthanda umsebenzi wakhe, kwaye sinobuhlobo xa sibonana kwi-Intanethi nangobuqu).

Ngeli xesha, uReilly 'wayexhalabile' ngenxa yeetweets ezandayo nezingaqondakaliyo ezivela ku-Elliott, kwaye ngenxa yokuba wathumela umyalezo malunga nomsitho eCadillac Lounge, indawo eyaziwayo kwindawo yaseToronto kunye neapos; s Parkdale, ngobusuku xa wayelapho.

Bobabini aba bafazi bavimbe u-Elliott bamxelela ukuba angaqhakamshelani nabo ngokuqhubekayo.

Buyela kwisigwebo: Ukuze u-Elliott afumaneke enetyala, kwafuneka kuqinisekiswe ukuba wayesazi ukuba wayehlukumeza abafazi, kwaye babesoyika ngenxa yoko. Kwakufuneka kuqinisekiswe ukuba uloyiko lwabo lwalusengqiqweni.

UKnazan uthathe isigqibo sokuba u-Elliott wayengazi ukuba uyamhlukumeza uGuthrie, kwaye uloyiko lwakhe lwalungekho ngqiqweni. Ugqibe kwelokuba uElliott uyazi ukuba uyamhlukumeza uReilly.

Kodwa akakhange anike bungqina obucacileyo bokuba 'woyika'-endaweni yoko, wathi' ukhathazekile. ' Ngenxa yoko, kwaye ngenxa yokuba ebona ukuba uloyiko alunangqiqo, izityholo ezichasene no-Elliott zachithwa.

UKnazan, nangona kunjalo, ulawule ukuba omabini la mabhinqa ayaphathwa gadalala, kwaye ezinye ze-Elliott & apos; s tweets 'zazingcolile' kwaye 'zibuhlungu.'

Abantu abaninzi ngoku bayabuza ukuba kutheni uElliott efunyaniswe engenatyala? Ngaphaya koko, kwakutheni ukuze umntu ongenakuze aqonde ukuba kuyintoni ukugrogriswa ngale ndlela wabekwa uxanduva lokujonga ukuba semthethweni kwabasetyhini kunye ne-apos;

Esi sigwebo siyakhathaza. Umzekelo sele umiselwe ukuba ukuba umntu uxhatshazwa kwi-intanethi, olo xhatshazo aluyi kuthathwa njengolwaphulo-mthetho ngaphandle kokuba kufakwe into ethile, okanye ngaphandle kokuba umhlukumezi asebenzise ngokuphindaphindiweyo ulwimi olunobundlobongela.

'Indlela endisabele ngayo kweso sigwebo yayi & & apos; Kuhle, lixesha elivulekileyo kwabasetyhini ngoku, & apos;' I-MPP yase-Ontario NDP uCheri DiNovo uxelele i-MediaMente. 'Ungathetha nantoni na oyithandayo malunga nalo naliphi na ibhinqa olifunayo, yinkululeko nje yokuthetha.'

Kucacile ukuba uKnazan akaluqondi uloyiko lobundlobongela abasetyhini abahamba nabo, kwaye ngeliphi ixesha ekunxibelelaneni nendoda uloyiko oluqala ukubonakalisa. Wayesoloko esithi akukho zoyikiso zomzimba okanye zesondo zenziweyo. Kodwa abasetyhini baziva besoyikiswa, kwaye yile ndlela iqala ngayo ubundlobongela: ngokwesoyikiso nasekulawuleni isimilo. Ubundlobongela buvela kwabo bangayikhathalelanga imida yabanye abantu. I-intanethi yindawo enkulu engalawulwa kakuhle apho abantu bangabahoyi abanye & iiapos; imida inokuchuma.

U-Knazan ngokwakhe uthe, 'Kusengqiqweni ukuba uloyiko lunokuvela xa umntu eqhubeka nokunxibelelana nomntu emva kokuba eceliwe ukuba ayeke. Oko kuziphatha kunokubonisa ngokufanelekileyo ukuba umntu oqhubeka nonxibelelwano wayenakho nantoni na kuba engasihoyanga isicelo. '

Siphila ubomi obuninzi kwi-intanethi ngoku, kwaye ngenxa yoko, umntu ohambisa umntu obhinqileyo kwi-intanethi emva kokuba ebuziwe ukuba angazibandakanyi naye unetyala lokunyanga i-tomism.

Kodwa loo nyani ibonakala ilahlekile kwiKnazan. Ngexesha lokuvavanywa kwetyala, umcebisi wesithsaba wabuza uReilly ukuba achaze ukuba wayethetha ntoni ngo-Elliott & apos; Cadillac Lounge tweet malunga 'nayo.' Uthe 'ebengazi ukuba ikamva lakhe lingayintoni ukuba ebekhethe ukukonyusa ukungcungcutheka ukusuka kwi-Intanethi ukuya kumntu.'

Uye wangqina ukuba intsingiselo yokuba wayekhona emzimbeni kwiCadillac yamnika 'umbono wokuba wayendibamba nangona ii-tweets zam, kwaye wayenokuba nakweyiphi na indawo endandikuyo, kwaye ndaziva ngathi oko kungakhokelela kwisoyikiso kubuntu bam ukhuseleko. Oku kubonakale kukhula ukusuka kwigama elibiza ngamandla… oku kunokuba yingozi emzimbeni kum. & Apos; '

Angathini umntu ukuba acace gca ukuba bayoyika? Kodwa uKnazan wagqiba kwelokuba ukuba uyoyika, uloyiko lwakhe lwalungekho ngqiqweni.

Kwityala likaGuthrie & apos, uKnazan ubanga ukuba uElliott wayengazi ukuba uGuthrie wayehlukunyezwa. Ukuthintela, utshilo, ayisiyongxaki yokuziva uhlukunyezwa (nangona abasetyhini kuyo yonke indawo bekuxelela ukuba ewe, kunjalo). Ngapha koko, uGuthrie uphinde wathumela i-tweets malunga no-Elliott emva kokumvimba. UKnazan usola uGuthrie ngale nto, esithi ukuqhubeka nokuvuma ubukho bakhe kuya kuba yinto engekhoyo, kwingqondo ka-Elliott & apos, uluvo lokuba wayekhathazwa.

Ulwaphulo-mthetho lwe-Guthrie kunye ne-apos; kubonakala ngathi bezithethela. Ukuba uziva ehlukunyezwa kwaye esoyika, kuyacaca ukuba ngewayethule ngomnwe wakhe ngaphezulu kwe 'block account' yomsebenzi kunokuba athethe phandle. Njengoko uGuthrie wangqina, akukho xhoba lifanelekileyo, kodwa iinkundla zisilela ngokusemthethweni ukukuqonda oko.

Ngamafutshane, iinkundla zisanda kugweba amadoda ukuba athethe nantoni na ayifunayo kubafazi.

UDiNovo uthi ngokokubona kwakhe, ukuhlukumeza umntu okwi-intanethi akufani noko nokumhlukumeza emnxebeni, okanye nkqonkqoza emnyango kwaye ukhwaza ebusweni. Nokuba yeyiphi na indlela, uthi, kukuziphatha gadalala okufuna ukuyekiswa, kwaye ngoku, iinkundla ziyicaphukisile.

'Ngokucacileyo oku kuzakuvumela la madoda-kuba yile nto & bangabo-ukuba bande, kwaye baphumeze le [ndlela yokuziphatha].'

USaira Muzaffar lilungu elisekayo leTech Girls Canada, i-NGO edibanisa abasetyhini abakwiindawo ze-STEM kunye noluntu olukhulu lobuchwephesha. Inxalenye yomsebenzi wakhe ibandakanya ukukhokela amaphulo malunga nokunyangwa kwabantu abahlelelekileyo kubasebenzi. Njengoko esitsho, 'Eli lixhoba eligxeka ngokubonakalayo kuluntu lwaseCanada.'

Ayisiyiyo kuphela uKnazan angabuqondiyo ubundlobongela obujoliswe kwabasetyhini, waphinda wavuma ukuba akayazi indlela esebenza ngayo iTwitter. Uchithe isuntswana leyure yokuqala yesigwebo efunda into ayifundileyo ngeqonga okoko kwaqala ukuthethwa kwetyala. Ukungakwazi kwakhe ukungathandeki kubonakaliswa yindlela ekubonakala ngayokubangelwa i-tweet yobungqingiliukusuka ' Iakhawunti ye-parody ka-Eliott (Qaphela upelo) ku-Elliott ngokwakhe. (Yeyiphi imibutho yeendaba emininzi, kubandakanya nathi, ecatshulwe kwesi sigwebo.)

'Yayibubungqina obupheleleyo, ke angaziva njani ukuba wayenolwazi olwaneleyo lokuqhubeka nokwenza isigqibo?' UMuzaffar uyazibuza.

Uyisasazile le tweet kunye nayo & apos kwirekhodi yoluntu. Ngaba uza kujongana nemiphumo yoko? '

U-Knazan wenze izingqinisiso ezininzi 'kubomi bokwenyani' kunye nokungabikho kobundlobongela obuphathelele kwezesondo kunye nokuhlaselwa ngokwasemzimbeni kule meko, into engezantsi kukuba i-Twitter ayibobomi bokwenyani.

Kodwa bubomi bokwenyani, ngakumbi kubantu abanjengoGuthrie. I-Twitter yindawo apho adibana khona nabantu emsebenzini, ubuhlobo kunye nolwalamano.

Imithetho, njengoko uMuzaffar esitsho, iphelelwe lixesha ukuba ingaphendula ngolwaphulo-mthetho lwale mihla. Esi sigwebo, yena kunye ne-apos, siqinisekile, siya kuba yingozi hayi kubafazi kuphela, kodwa kubo bonke abantu abahlelelekileyo kwi-intanethi.

UDiNovo uthi ekubeni abantu behlala kwi-intanethi ngoku, kwaye kuyinto eqhelekileyo ukuba abantu basetyhini kufuneka babenakho ukuhlala kweso sithuba ngaphandle kokulindela ukuxhatshazwa yonke imizuzu embalwa.

Olo luhlobo olwahlukileyo lokuhlaselwa, utshilo uDiNovo, 'xa abantu bekhutshiwe kwimithombo yeendaba. Abavunyelwe ukuba basebenzise isixhobo amadoda avunyelwe ukuba asisebenzise ngenxa yokoyika ukuhlaselwa.

'Ukuba, ngalo naliphi na ixesha ukwijelo losasazo, oko kuthetha ukuba uzivulela ngokwakho kwihlabathi lokuxhatshazwa, ingaba kulungile? Kwaye, ngokuphandle, inyani yokuba abantu basetyhini ingoyena mxholo wale nto kunamadoda, ngaba kulungile? '

Ndicela uDiNovo ukuba ajongane njani noku ukuya phambili ukuba inkqubo yezobulungisa ayithathi xanduva ngayo. Uthi yena & ampos; sisaqhuba, kodwa uhambisa umbono wokuzisa umthetho osayilwayo wokujongana nokuhlukunyezwa kwi-Intanethi kunye nobundlobongela obenziwa kwabasetyhini. Uye wathi abantu banokubekwa ityala lentetho yokuhlukumeza abanye abantu kwi-Intanethi. Ngayiphi na indlela, utshilo, ibar kufuneka ibekwe phezulu kakhulu kunokoyikiso lobundlobongela.

Kwakhona, indoda 'inkululeko yokuthetha' ixilonga ilungelo labasetyhini lokuziva bekhuselekile kwaye bekhuselekile.

Kwaye kwakhona, kwaye kwangqinwa ukuba inkqubo yezobulungisa yaseCanada ayinakulindelwa ukuba isebenze kwabasetyhini. Njengesiqhelo, ii-apos zizakuba phezulu kwabafazi ukufumana indlela yokulungisa ubumdaka.

Landela uSarah Ratchford kwi Twitter .